top of page
Diagnostic Banner Ad.jpg
Newsletter Ad.jpg

Guiding, Not Grinding: How to Successfully Onboard a New Graduate Vet Into Your Clinic

  • Writer: Dr Dave Nicol
    Dr Dave Nicol
  • 15 hours ago
  • 14 min read
stethoscope on yellow background

There is a familiar phrase muttered around veterinary medicine from time to time:


“They don’t make them like they used to.”


It is usually said with a sigh, a shake of the head, or a thinly disguised frustration about the next generation of vets entering practice. Sometimes it is dressed up as concern. Sometimes it is much less kind than that.


But whether we say it out loud or not, many practice leaders are carrying some version of that belief. New graduates are too fragile. Too demanding. Too slow. Too expensive. Too difficult to mentor. Too different from the vets who came before them.

The problem is that this way of thinking does nothing to solve the issue. Worse, it allows practice leaders to abdicate responsibility for the environment they are asking new graduates to survive in.

The real question is not, “Why aren’t new graduates tougher?”

The better question is, “Are we building clinics where new graduates can actually grow?”

Because the first year in practice should not be an endurance test. It should be an intentional transition from student to doctor. It should be a year of guided exposure, structured skill development, protected mentorship, and steadily increasing confidence.

In other words, we need to stop grinding new graduates down and start guiding them properly.

The Problem With Throwing Graduates Into Practice

Many practices hire a new graduate because they need another vet.


That is understandable. Clinics are busy. Recruitment is hard. Caseloads are high. Existing doctors are stretched and everyone is stressed. When a bright, enthusiastic new graduate appears, it is tempting to see them as the answer to a capacity problem.


But a new graduate is not simply a “vet-shaped solution” to a schedule gap.


They are a developing professional at one of the most vulnerable and important stages of their career. They may have passed their exams. They may have impressive knowledge. They may be intelligent, motivated, and conscientious. But they are not yet ready to carry the full emotional, cognitive, clinical, and commercial load of general practice without meaningful support.


When practices forget that, the consequences are predictable and disastrous.


The graduate becomes overwhelmed. Their confidence plunges. They stop taking appropriate risks and become afraid of making mistakes - they retreat into survival mode. The practice becomes frustrated that the graduate is not progressing quickly enough. Quietly, the graduate begins to wonder whether they chose the wrong career, and if this goes on long enough, eventually, they leave.


Sometimes, if we’re lucky, they leave our practice. But too many leave clinical work altogether.


Hiring graduates into inappropriate roles is expensive, risky, and damaging. Practices invest time, energy, money, and emotional effort into someone who may then leave long before that investment has paid off. But more importantly, every time a young vet is badly damaged by their first experience in practice, the whole profession loses.


We cannot afford to keep leaking talent this way.


What New Graduates Are Really Struggling With

I have been running or participating in graduate development programs for more than a decade. I’ve run them in my own practices, worked as a tutor on corporate programs, and launched one of the first online mentoring programs in the world nearly ten years ago. I also wrote a book for new graduates called So You’re A Vet… Now What? Through these various initiatives, I’ve had the pleasure and privilege to mentor (directly and indirectly) thousands of graduates across the world. One part of this work involved surveying participants about their experience in practice. We asked what drained them, what energized them, and how satisfied they were with their career choice.

The findings were revealing.

The biggest drains were not simply “medicine is hard” or “graduates cannot cope.” The major stressors were difficult client interactions, being overworked, not having enough time, exam room time pressure, and complex cases.

That matters because many of those problems are not graduate problems. They are human relational skills or system problems.

If a new graduate is seeing too many patients, with too little time, too little support, and too little client communication training, then the problem is not their resilience. The problem is the job design. 

The energizers told an equally important story.

Appreciative clients were one of the biggest sources of energy. So were a good team, positive case outcomes, surgery, and learning new skills.

That means clients are not inherently the problem. Cases are not inherently the problem. Learning is not inherently the problem.

The problem is the way graduates are being exposed to those things.

When client interactions go well, they are energizing. When they go badly, they are draining. When surgical skills are taught progressively, surgery builds confidence. When graduates are thrown into procedures beyond their current capability, surgery becomes traumatic. When learning is supported, it creates growth. When learning is left to chance, it creates fear.

The same environment can either grow a graduate or grind them down.

The difference is intentionality.

The Power of Having a Plan

One of the most striking findings from the graduate survey was the relationship between career satisfaction and having a plan.

Among those who scored their career satisfaction low, very few had a clear development plan. Among those who were moderately satisfied, more had a plan. Among those who were highly satisfied, the majority had one.

We cannot say from that data alone whether having a plan causes career satisfaction, or whether happier people are more likely to plan. But we do know from experience, leadership, and positive psychology that humans do better when they can see a future they both want and are moving toward. Goal setting is another clear leadership job.

A new graduate needs to know:

What am I expected to learn?

How will I be supported?

Who is responsible for helping me?

What will the first month look like?

What will the first year look like?

How will we know whether I am progressing?

What happens if I struggle?

What happens if I am ready for more?

Without a plan, the graduate is left guessing. And when someone is already carrying the uncertainty of early clinical practice, guesswork is a heavy burden.

A graduate onboarding program does not need to be rigid. Veterinary practice is too unpredictable for that. But it does need a structure. It needs a map. It needs a rhythm. It needs a sense that someone has thought carefully about the journey ahead.

The Five Laws of Guiding Effectively

A successful graduate program does not happen by accident. It is built around principles that protect both the graduate and the practice.

Here are five laws developed over the years of both delivering and observing graduate training across hundreds of practices. I believe every clinic should be able to follow these laws before hiring a new graduate.

Law 1: Someone Must Be Explicitly Accountable for the Graduate’s Experience

It is not enough to say, “We have lots of experienced vets here. Someone will help.”

That sounds supportive, but in reality, it often means no one is truly responsible.

If mentoring is everyone’s job, it easily becomes no one’s priority. Everyone is busy. Everyone has cases. Everyone assumes someone else is checking in. The graduate may receive intermittent help, but they do not receive structured guidance.

A new graduate needs a named mentor.

That person does not need to provide every piece of support personally. In fact, graduates benefit from a wider culture of mentorship across the practice. But someone must hold the thread. Someone must know how the graduate is doing, what they are working on, where they are struggling, and what needs to happen next.

Without clear accountability, graduates can fall through the cracks.

Law 2: The System Must Have Capacity and Capability to Mentor

A willing mentor is not enough. The practice must have the capacity to mentor and the capability to mentor well.

Capacity means there is time in the system. If the mentor is already overloaded, fully booked, emotionally depleted, or constantly pulled into emergencies, they cannot provide consistent support. If the graduate’s own schedule is packed with back-to-back appointments, surgery, dentals, call-backs, and urgent cases, they have no space to learn.

Capability means the mentor has the skills to support another person’s development. Clinical experience alone does not make someone a good mentor. Mentorship requires patience, listening, emotional intelligence, coaching ability, and the willingness to let someone learn at the right pace.

A mentor who says, “You’ve got this,” and then leaves the building may mean well.

But that is not mentorship.

At best, it is optimism. At worst, it is abandonment.

Law 3: Expectations Must Be Staged, Not Implied

New graduates should not have to guess what “good” looks like.

Too often, expectations are implied rather than explained. A graduate does something once, so the practice assumes they can now do it faster, with less help, under more pressure, and with more complexity. That is not development. That is escalation without assessment.

Progression must be staged.

That means the practice should define what the first week, first month, first quarter, and first year might look like. It should be clear which skills are foundational, which skills are more advanced, and what level of independence is expected at each stage.

For example, in surgery, the early goal may be tissue handling, instrument handling, simple incisions, ligatures, and suturing. Later, those foundational skills can be combined into more complex procedures.

The same applies to exam room process, dentistry, diagnostics, communication, medical reasoning, and client management.

Graduates need to stretch carefully. They do not need to be placed onto a skills rack and torn apart! Staged expectations create useful and healthy “stretch challenges”. Implied expectations create panic when things become chaotically overwhelming.

Law 4: Support Must Be Available at the Point of Need

Classroom training has value, but it is not enough.

The moments that shape a graduate happen in the exam room, the treatment area, the dental suite, the operating theater, the pharmacy, and the car park after a difficult client conversation.

These are the moments of truth.

A graduate does not only need support at a scheduled training day three weeks later. They need help when they are deciding what to say to a client, whether to take another radiograph, how to approach a difficult extraction, whether a case is safe to manage, or how to communicate uncertainty. Perhaps most importantly, when something has gone wrong.

This is why mentorship must live close to the work.

The goal is not to prevent every mistake. That is impossible and undesirable. Graduates need experience. They need to make decisions. They need to feel the discomfort of failing as part of learning.

But there is a difference between allowing someone to be bruised by experience and allowing them to be wounded by trauma.

Good mentorship allows safe struggle.

Poor mentorship leaves people alone in situations they are not yet ready to carry.

Law 5: Progress Must Be Intentional

A graduate program cannot be a vague hope that “they’ll pick things up as they go.”

Progress should be actively reviewed, discussed, and adjusted.

That does not mean every day needs to be scripted. Veterinary practice is far too chaotic for that. But the graduate’s development should have a clear direction and a regular rhythm of review.

At minimum, this should include:

  1. A clear skills framework for the year.

  2. Protected weekly mentorship meetings.

  3. Quarterly development reviews.

  4. Frequent informal check-ins.

Such structure provides a shared understanding of what the next stage of growth looks like.

The danger is not always that everything is dumped on a graduate at once. Sometimes the danger is slower and more insidious. One extra responsibility is added. Then another. Then another. Each individual ask seems reasonable until, collectively, they become unbearable.

Intentional progress prevents accidental overload through regular check-ins and sensible, frequent two-way feedback. Is progress on track, and how is everyone feeling?

The First Year Is Not Just Practice Onboarding

Most practices think about onboarding as something that happens in the first few days or weeks.

Here is the building. Here is the software. Here is the drug cupboard. Here is the schedule. This is our PIMS. Here is how we do estimates. Here is where the biscuits live. We do pizza and tears on Fridays when things get really bad…

That is useful, but it is not nearly enough.

For a new graduate, the first year is not simply onboarding into your practice. It is an induction into our profession.

That shift in thinking matters because it shifts our thinking from transaction to stewardship.

You are not just filling a role. You are helping shape a future vet. You are influencing how they see themselves, how they relate to clients, how they handle pressure, how they recover from mistakes, and whether they believe they belong in this profession.

That is not only a serious responsibility, but it’s a massive strategic opportunity. Just think, everything this person will go on to accomplish will have been, in some small way, enabled by those who helped in those early days. 

A practice that becomes known as a place where new graduates are genuinely developed will also have a long-term recruitment advantage. Even if (indeed when) your graduates eventually leave, they will leave as competent and confident advocates. They will speak well of the practice that looked after them. They will send others your way.

People remember their first professional home - make sure yours is remembered for the right reasons.

Designing the Graduate Role Properly

A good graduate role is not simply a normal vet role with longer consults.

It needs to be designed more carefully.

The workload should allow for progressive exposure. The graduate should start with appropriate case volume and complexity. As their skill increases, the volume and complexity can increase too.

The key is to keep the gap between skill level and case difficulty within the learning zone.

If the gap is too small, the graduate is not stretched. If the gap is too large, they enter panic.

The learning zone builds confidence.

The panic zone damages confidence.

This is where many practices get it wrong. They expose graduates to chaotic, unsupported volume too early. The graduate’s skill may still grow, but their emotional state crashes. They are more likely in this circumstance to become anxious, defensive, and fearful. Their development stalls because they are no longer learning from a place of curiosity. They are operating on survival instinct.

In a supported system, the graduate still experiences challenge. They still encounter difficulty. They still have wobbles. But those wobbles are contained by mentorship, reflection, and thoughtful job design.

The result is a vet who becomes more skilled, more confident, and more useful to the practice over time. And a far shorter time at that. Many of the graduates I have been involved with have become profitable employees within the first six months of joining the practice.

What Should Graduates Learn First?

Every practice will structure its program differently, but there are several areas that, in my opinion, are fairly obvious choices to include.

The first is non-clinical skills.

This includes communication, emotional intelligence, client relationship management, consultation structure, expectation setting, conflict management, persuasion, and teamwork.

Some graduates may resist this. Many vets did not go to vet school because they wanted to learn communication skills. But effective communication is not a nice-to-have skill set. It is the foundation of sustainable clinical practice. Without these skills, life is going to be tough.

Many complaints are not really about medicine. They are about communication. Many difficult client interactions become difficult because expectations were not set, trust was not built, or the client did not feel heard.

If we want graduates to cope better with clients, we must teach them how to communicate better with clients.

The second area is dentistry.

Dentistry is one of the most common and both clinically and commercially important areas of general practice, yet many graduates receive limited practical training in it. That creates a huge opportunity.

If a graduate can develop confidence in dentistry early, they gain practical surgical skills - tissue handling, suturing in tight spaces, decision-making ability, and a sense of clinical contribution. Dentistry provides repetition, transferable skills, and measurable progress. The impact is also huge, and there are few better feelings than the dental recheck where the beneficial impact of your work is so apparent on the animal and client gratitude flows abundantly. 

The third area is basic surgery.

This should begin with foundational skills: handling instruments, making incisions, controlling bleeding, placing ligatures, suturing, maintaining sterility, and understanding tissue respect. More complex procedures should come later, once the building blocks are secure. Many more advanced surgeries are completed by following a checklist and using foundational skills in various combinations. 

The fourth area is medical reasoning.

Graduates do not need to know everything. They need to learn how to think through complicated cases.

But never forget that “common things are common”. New vets need help recognizing patterns, forming problem lists, selecting sensible diagnostics, communicating uncertainty, and knowing when to pause, ask, refer, or escalate.

This kind of reasoning is best taught through real cases, reviewed regularly with a mentor. 

The Rhythm of Support

A graduate program needs a meeting rhythm that keeps development alive.

One useful structure is the Triple Loop Leadership cycle, which I published in the Veterinary Clinics of North America and have lectured on extensively. It’s a form of highly active performance support that hugely improves clarity and outcomes for managers and employees. It consists of three layers or loops and determines when meetings should happen and what the meetings are for.

The macro loop sets expectations for the year. This includes the role, the skills framework, the development plan, and the broad outcomes expected by the end of the first year.

The midi loop reviews progress quarterly. This is where the mentor and graduate assess what is going well, what needs more support, whether the graduate is ahead or behind, and what resources may be needed to stay on track.

The micro loop happens weekly. This is the regular support meeting that keeps the relationship strong and the development plan active. 

A simple weekly structure is the B.A.A.M. meeting:

Bonding: How are you? What is going on in your week?

Accomplishments: What went well? What did you learn? What are you proud of?

Actions: What are you working on next? What skills are you trying to develop?

Mentorship: What do you need from me?

These meetings do not need to be long. Fifteen to thirty minutes can be enough. But they must be protected.

The moment mentorship meetings are repeatedly sacrificed for clinical work, the program starts to fail.

Clinical work will always feel urgent. Mentorship is important. Strong leaders protect the important from being consumed by the urgent.

Not Every Practice Is Ready for a New Graduate

This may be the most important point of all. Not every job opening should be open to a new graduate. That is not a criticism. It is a responsible leadership assessment.

Some practices are not ready. They may be too busy, too unstable, too short-staffed, too inexperienced, or too stretched. They may not yet have the right mentor. They may not have the time. They may not have the workflow flexibility. They may not yet have the leadership maturity.

In that situation, the answer is not to hire a new graduate and hope for the best. The answer is to hire at a different level of experience.

A vet with 12 to 18 months under their belt may be a much better fit for a practice that can provide support but not intensive first-year mentorship. A more experienced vet may be better still.

Knowing what your system can support is not failure. It is wisdom.The mistake is hiring a graduate into a role your practice is not designed to sustain. Good intentions are not enough, the system has to be ready.

A Better Future for Graduates and Practices

When we guide graduates well, everyone wins.

The graduate becomes more confident, capable, and connected. The practice grows its own talent. The team benefits from fresh energy. Clients benefit from better-supported doctors. The profession benefits because fewer young vets are lost to burnout and disillusionment.

But none of this happens by accident. It happens because practice leaders take graduate onboarding seriously. Not as a week of induction. Not as a few ad hoc chats. Not as a vague promise that “we’re always here if you need us.”

It requires a designed role, a named mentor, protected time, staged expectations, point-of-need support, and an intentional development plan.

Above all, it requires us to see the first year in practice as an act of stewardship.

The best mentors do not simply ask, “How quickly can this graduate become useful to me?”

They ask, “How can I help send a skilled, confident veterinarian out into the world?”

When practices answer it well, graduates do not just survive, they stay, they grow, and most importantly of all, they feel as if they belong. Which, to my mind at least, is the precise opposite of feeling like an imposter. See why this might be a big deal?

And eventually, they become the kind of vets who stick around and help guide the next generation in turn.

Ready to Support Your New Graduate Vet Properly?

If you are bringing a new graduate vet into your clinic, or thinking about doing so, the most important question is not simply, “Can we hire them?”

It is, “Are we ready to guide them?”

New graduates need more than goodwill and a warm welcome. They need structure, support, mentorship, and a clear pathway from nervous beginner to confident clinician.

That is exactly why I created the So You’re A Vet… Now What? group of resources all published over on www.thevetgrad.com.

Inside The Vet Grad, you will find practical support for new graduate vets and the clinics that want to help them thrive, including:

These resources are part of the Vet Leadership Academy’s commitment to helping the next generation of veterinary professionals start well, stay well, and grow into the kind of doctors our profession needs.

Explore the resources at: https://www.thevetgrad.com/


Ready to Build Your Remarkable Veterinary Practice™?

Do you want to fall back in love with your practice?


Book a free consultation with one of our Remarkable Veterinary Practice™ Consultants to explore your biggest challenges - through the lens of vision, leadership, culture, and performance.


Together, we’ll uncover what’s holding your practice back and map a path toward a future that feels authentic, aligned, and remarkable. Whatever your challenge, we’d love to help you take the first step toward building a Remarkable Veterinary Practice™ you truly love.

Latest Posts

bottom of page